Twitter

Showing posts with label Fox News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fox News. Show all posts

Monday, February 25, 2013

Episode #6



Podcast Powered By Podbean
Week in Headlines
What's in the box?
Politics
Opinion
Crazy Israeli Sniper puts child in cross hairs posts to instagram.  This is despicable and disgusting.


I don't care!

Extra

Friday, February 8, 2013

Episode #4



Week in Headlines

  • 76 year old man bludgeons his wife to death with a garden gnome. England. sentenced to four years in prison. 
  • Alabama hostage standoff ends with child safe, gunman dead -  After a standoff of more than six days, FBI agents entered the bunker when they feared the child was in "imminent danger" at the hands of his abductor, who had killed a school bus driver, said Steve Richardson, special agent in charge in Mobile, Alabama. The kidnapper, identified as 65-year-old Jimmy Lee Dykes, had previously allowed authorities to deliver medication, coloring books and toys to the kindergarten student, who is due to celebrate his birthday on Wednesday.  The child was being treated at a local hospital but appeared physically unharmed, Richardson said. He is said to suffer from Asperger's Syndrome and attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Dykes would sit in his bunker for up to 8 days at a time
  • Bin Laden death town tourist attraction theme park  - Pakistan is planning to build a $30 million amusement park with a zoo and adventure sports facilities in the town where Osama bin Laden was killed by US special forces, officials said Monday. Abbottabad.  Government says it has nothing to do with Bin Laden.  Speculation that they are trying to make up for the reputation of the town that hid the terrorist.
  • Abbey Road Station confuses Beatles Fans
  • Amish sect leader Mullet sentenced to 15 years in beard attacks - Samuel Mullet Sr., referred throughout as just Mullet, disappointingly, had no mullet.
 What's in the box? 
  • Teen arrested for impersonating doctor in Australia -  17-year-old Australian boy was arrested on Friday for impersonating a physician at several hospitals in Adelaide, where he allegedly wore fake credentials and prescribed medication.  The unidentified teen is a suspect in a string of reports from as early as October of a fake doctor walking around in area hospitals. In each of three instances, the kid was caught and thrown out, but not before he assisted a 12-year-old girl who was injured in a scooter accident. The boy was seen on all three occasions wearing scrubs, name badges and a stethoscope. He allegedly offered first aid to the general public and read patient notes.
    The impersonation stunt gained the young suspect the moniker "Dr. Who" among hospital staff.\
  • 6 year old girl steals mom's car to visit dad - The girl managed to drive her mother's BMW a half mile before she hit anything, and though she was not hurt in the incident, a neighbor who was outside shoveling snow told WTAE that he had a close call with the oncoming vehicle.
    "I thought she was going to hit me, but then she stopped just in time not to hit me, and as I observed, she was this little kid. She couldn’t have been more than 8 or 9 years old," Rommie Hawkins told the news outlet. Hit two parked cars and eventually smashing the vehicle into a utility pole
  • Burglar disguised as suns steals a towel - Brett Eric Drachenburg, 51, is accused of stealing a towel, then trying to disguise himself as "The Sun," the Northwest Florida Daily News reported. Drachenburg allegedly entered a private home in Walton County, Fla. and proceeded to steal a towel. According to an arrest report obtained by The Huffington Post, Drachenburg "did unlawfully deprive the owner of the use of the towel."  When deputies were investigating the incident, Drachenburg was "disguising himself as 'The Sun' with the intent to obstruct the due execution of law." The report does not specify how Drachenburg attempted to pull off such a deception. Additionally, it is unclear whether or not the man was trying to pass as the actual sun, or as a copy of a publication, such as the Sun Sentinel, which might be referred to as "The Sun." When queried about these two matters, a spokeswoman for the Walton  County Sheriff's Office told HuffPost that “"[It looks like] "The Sun” ... is the name he gave for himself to the deputy."
  • Kimberly Margeson French Kisses Jailed Son, William Partridge, To Give Him Drugs - passing oxycodone in prison
  • Lottery Winner posioned - A lawyer who represents the widow of a Chicago man who was mysteriously  poisoned with cyanide after winning the lottery says most of the businessman's $2 million estate should go to his client. In my opinion, the mystery of the murderer has been solved.
Sports!
  • Meta World Peace Strikes again -  The Los Angeles Lakers forward was suspended for one game without pay because of his altercation Sunday with Detroit Pistons guard Brandon Knight. World Peace grabbed Knight around the neck and struck him on the jaw.World Peace has a long history of antagonizing opponents and last was suspended for an elbow to the face of Oklahoma City Thunder guard James Harden in April 2012. That one earned him a seven-game suspension. He also was a key instigator in "The Malice in the Palace," the infamous 2004 brawl between the Pistons and Indiana Pacers. Then known Ron Artest, World Peace entered the stands to pursue a fan. He and the fan have since made amends.
  • Power goes out at Superbowl
  • Pitcher breaks ribs horsing around - Minnesota Twins reliever Anthony Swarzak  messing around with a couple guys and cracked a couple ribs, so he'll be out a month," Ryan said. "He was wrestling around. It was some horseplay. He was out with a couple friends and the team and cracked a couple ribs fooling around. It wasn't a fight or anything. It was just bad judgment wrestling around."
Politics
Opinion
French Film maker preparing to Shoot Newtown Movie for TV TOO SOON. WHAT THE HECK ARE YOU THINKING.

I don't care!
Extra Stuff
Woman Hits Man in the Head with Jar of Olives and Other Strange Police News

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Post-Election Blues

So if you've been following this blog, you already know my feelings about the results.  I'm relieved.  On facebook I had complained and argued with people about the election, the platforms, the candidates, and fighting the pro-Romney propaganda that 80% of my friends have been posting.  It got so out of control that at one point a woman actually wrote to my wife and told her that she was no longer going to be her friend on facebook anymore because she "didn't support socialism" and that some day my wife "would regret voting for Obama".

 This is my response  to that statement.  First, what is socialism?  Webster says :

1. Any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods


2. a: system of society or group living in which there is no private property

    b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state


3. a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done



She was, of course, referring to the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) as socialism.  It's a very complicated law, and there isn't really much else I can do but oversimplify it by boiling it down to it's essence.  The law says everyone must have insurance.  You may keep your private insurance if you currently have it, but if you don't have it, you are now required by law to have it.  If you didn't have it because of pre-existing conditions that barred you from obtaining it, pre-existing conditions are discriminatory and against the law.  If you don't want private insurance, you may sign up for what I'm sure will be a really sh***y  plan from the government. If you cannot afford insurance, the premiums will be adjusted so that you can afford it. If you are so dirt poor that paying for insurance is above your cost of living, you will qualify for medicaid.

Sure, in theory, saying that everyone must have health insurance is a socialistic philosophy.  Everyone is equal in that sense.  But if you look at the execution of the law it does not meet the definition at all.

1. The government does not own the means of production.  Doctors and nurses are not government employees.  The government is not the sole provider of insurance; as evidenced by multiple insurance agencies that exist and will continue to exist after the plan is fully implemented.

2. a: You will still own your own home, car, and even your private insurance.  You can even change to another private insurance if you want.
    b. The government is now saying you have to have insurance.  If you take out a loan on a car, the bank requires you to have insurance for the car.  The government is now saying if you are alive, you need to have insurance.  It's in your best interest to have it.  If you are poor or middle class and get sick or are in an accident, you may never have the money you need for healthcare costs in your lifetime. 60% of all bankruptcies are healthcare related,  Healthcare costs are outrageously high and growing every year.  Why you would not want insurance is something I will not understand.  But according to definition 2 b., Obamacare does not equal socialism.

3. Do you really believe we are in a transition into communism?  Do you see the redistribution of wealth?  Oh, you might say, there are going to be higher taxes on the rich to pay for government programs for the poor!  That's not how it works.  Redistribution of wealth would be that at the end of the day, the money you've made that exceeds the standard of living dictated by government, would be taken from you and given to people who did not make enough to meet the standard of living.  And by the way, your employer is the government.

From what I've seen and heard, no one really understands what the word "socialism" means.  They know that it's a dirty word, so they use it to describe what they don't understand.   I don't understand why most Republicans don't want poor and sick people to get the healthcare they need.  I guess that makes me socialist.

One of the things that I liked most about this election, was Karl Rove was caught with his metaphoric pants down.  With over a billion dollars spent on the election, his superpacs gave Karl a minuscule return on investment.  In fact, according to NPR,  of all the money spent on the presidential election this year, less than 2% was supporting the candidate that actually won the election.  Less than 2%.  That's a big win for America.  It proves that democracy still works, and apparently there are still people out there that can think for themselves and are not persuaded by TV ads.  I can't help but laugh at every story I see come out about how millionaires and billionaires are gunning for Rove.  Here's a guy who was even called out on FOX news the night of the election for doing the kind of math that republican's do to "make themselves feel better."  He is so much in denial that he argued for a good twenty minutes that Ohio was not lost in the election before slinking off into the shadows to wet his pants.  Unfortunately, Rove made millions himself from this election by collecting transactional fees from the billionaires he misled.  In a way that's actually kind of cool.  Karl Rove robbing the rich to stuff his own fat pockets.  Hat's off to you Karl, you're a true capitalist.  An opportunity arose and you grabbed it by the horns.


Moving on to my last topic, this is something else that's been bothering me lately.  Look up at the graphic I posted above of the U.S. of A by electoral votes.  I saw a lot of complaining about how if most of the US is red, how did Obama get elected?  Well, for those of you who have never left your red state, let me tell you.  It's because states are allocated electoral votes based on population. The US census on July 1, 2011, estimated that there was a population of 568,158 people living in Wyoming.  The same census reported the population of New York (state) at 19,465,197.  New York is much more densely populated, though it is significantly smaller than Wyoming.  For those of you who understand math, New York has more people than Wyoming.  Wouldn't it make sense that New York counts more than Wyoming in elections because there are more people?  It's really pretty easy.  Don't strain your brain thinking about it.

The news has been reporting a lot of redistricting as well to suppress votes and swing elections.  Guess what, Obama also won the popular vote, so no matter how you divide it, you'll at least know that the populace didn't choose your candidate.  Get over yourselves.  


Tuesday, July 3, 2012

The Problem With Today's News

"The media's the most powerful entity on Earth.  They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power.  Because they control the minds of the masses." Malcom X

"A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant and the crazy crazier. " H. L. Mencken

Last Thursday I witnessed what news networks are really all about: being the first to report, regardless if the facts are there.  I don't doubt that each network had prepared days in advance multiple different stories and scenarios to begin with, and as the facts came in, would tailor their stories to the facts.  But the Supreme Court issued a document nearly 150 pages long explaining the ruling, so how could anyone decipher the complexities of the bill and its explanation of existence in less than a day?

I personally have lost all faith in news networks.  Too often we forget that the news, like sitcoms, is driven by ratings, advertising, and feedback from focus groups.  Each network has some kind of angle to every story, because  "good television" is more important than honest straightforward facts.  "Good television" allows for opinion to be masqueraded as fact.  

Networks know they can play on our competitive nature because "good television" evokes emotion in the viewer.  No matter what happens in Washington, you will turn on the news to see a "win for the Republicans today" or "a devastating blow to the Republican party" depending on the channel.  Thursday was a montage of contradicting statements of whether Obama's campaign hung in the balance or if he would gain momentum, depending on the each channel's chosen side of the political spectrum.  It's almost as if there is an invisible scoreboard of victories and losses that drive the stories that are aired like a countdown to the superbowl. Chalking up wins or a losses skews the way Americans view current events.

The media  also plays on our innate sense of justice and injustice.  When a crime is committed the villains and victims are immediately identified by the networks.  The recent case of Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman comes to mind.  Depending on which channel you watch, Zimmerman was a racist, cold-blooded killer, or Martin was a dangerous hoodlum who had it coming.  The only people who know what transpired that night are Martin, Zimmerman, and God, and yet Americans pretend to know "what really happened."  And before you know it, what the murder case is "really about" is racism, class, and status.

Casey Anthony, Amanda Knox, and O.J. Simpson are good examples of media villains.  Blood for blood was demanded by the reporters, but in a court of law there was not enough evidence to convict any of them.  By digging up enough information to create a colorful past, the media convinced viewers that these lowlifes were definitely capable of murder.  Nobody knew who Casey Anthony or Amanda Knox were, but over night they were hated by all America because we were convinced they are murderers.

I'm all for freedom of speech, but it is unethical to report opinion as news.  The way news is reported today is shameful.   In the eyes of the netorks, Americans are too stupid to understand current events and come up with our own opinions.  We're told exactly how to feel, and we're blinded from seeing the more important issues.  It shouldn't be about which political party comes away with a win, but did we as Americans win?  In the case of healthcare, did Americans overall win from the Supreme Court Ruling?

Maybe we are too stupid to come up with our own opinions.  We like be told what we want to hear because we're afraid the truth may evoke a sense of duty to act and remove ourselves from complacency .  We like to pick villains and heroes.  We like to see our heroes as invincible, and we're willing to overlook our heroes' flaws because we like to hate the villain more than we like to love our hero.  We like to point fingers and pretend we are experts on everything.  We enjoy telling others why they're wrong, especially when we know that we're wrong.  We enjoy believing that underneath every executive decision lies a bigger cinematic plot bubbling to escape.  

Each political debate in which we engage is about who's a better debater, when it should be what is the right answer?  The media preaches only black and white, right and wrong, good and evil, and those are defined completely different by each station.  Deep down, I think Americans know that there are not two solutions to every problem, but that's what we've decided to accept.